Menu

Blogs

Nashville No Habla Espaňol? Or Putonghua or Italiano or...

ACCE Webmaster on Monday, December 15, 2008 at 6:47:11 pm 

Next month Nashville voters may decide to make English the official language of Music City. 

A proposed city charter amendment declaring English the official language and banning the city from providing services in any other language will be on the ballot in a special election on January 22.  Legal attempts to keep the issue off the ballot have failed in the Tennessee Supreme Court, and voters will now decide.

Nashville Mayor Karl Dean has spoken out against the proposed amendment.  Addressing a Nashville Chamber group last week, Mayor Dean said, "I'm opposed [to the amendment], it is the antithesis of hospitality and a drain on our resources."  The special election is estimated to cost the city $300,000.  

Speculating on the economic development impact should the amendment pass, Mayor Dean added, "This issue is divisive and will detract from our efforts to bring foreign investment to the city."  The Nashville Area Chamber is opposed to English only legislation.

Click HERE to access the article from The Tennessean.

Rate this Article  rating of 0 from 0 votes
Immigration | 0 Comments | Add a Comment | Permalink |

On the Advocacy Field, Success Starts With Structure

ACCE Webmaster on Friday, December 12, 2008 at 7:09:00 pm 

Lumachi By Shuan Lumachi, President, Chamber Advocacy

In the game of baseball, nothing happens until the pitcher throws a ball. But the pitcher is not the only one with responsibility to ensure that the game is played. Umpires are uniquely positioned to make important decisions based on the structure outlined in the rules of baseball. Under these rules, umpires have the authority to make decisions based on their best judgment at any given time.  Umpires are leaders on the baseball field just like a chamber’s chief executive is a leader in the community. Chamber leaders are uniquely positioned within the organization to make decisions each day based on their best judgment at the time. Those decisions are oftentimes made or not made depending on the CEO’s confidence in the structure of their organization. Drilling down even further, any leader of an advocacy-oriented chamber of commerce makes important decisions every day that ultimately represent the interests of their business community with government. Without a structure in place to make necessary decisions, any coach (chairman of the board), teammate (staff), or fan (chamber member) can force your game (advocacy) in any direction, at any time.

 

There is a big difference between a chamber of commerce that just informs its membership about public policy and a chamber that goes out there and takes a strong position. A chamber of commerce is the most efficient and effective it can be when its leaders develop a clear advocacy plan outlining who has the authority to do what, when and how.

 

“If you do not have a solid structure in place, you will find yourself being forced to ‘shoot from the hip’ when reacting to issues,†advises David Kilby, president of the Western Association of Chamber Executives. “It is essential to develop a structure to really be a proactive and influential voice for your business community.â€

 

Build an A-team

 

If I were ever to write a love story about the chamber of commerce industry, the protagonist would be a chamber of commerce committee. We love committees. It is the way we build consensus, get the work done, and create results. Charles F. Kettering, the late inventor and research chief for General Motors Corporation, once quipped: “If you want to kill any idea in the world, get a committee working on it.†For all the disadvantages of a chamber of commerce committee, it is the process we know well enough to use to get what we want done.

 

Therefore, the work horse of a chamber’s government affairs efforts is its government affairs committee (GAC). When forming a GAC or even when jump-starting your current committee, I always ask chambers to assess the caliber of the decision-makers who make up their committee. I recommend using a “litmus test†when deciding if the decision-makers are the best: can they invest money; are they politically active and/or are they politically connected; do they understand the issues; and are they committed to being proactive; do they understand what is important to business?

 

Once the right people have been recruited, your GAC must have what I call “controlled participation†when making decisions. I recommend no fewer than eight voting members and no more than twenty-one. The size of the committee should only be determined based upon demand; if you can secure twenty-one active voting participants, no matter the size of your chamber, then seat twenty-one. However, if you can only get eight, then go with eight. Do not dilute the value of the GAC by opening it up to every person possible. Increase your GAC’s perceived value by limiting the supply of voting seats in order to maintain a demand for participation.

 

The bottom line: get the best in the room. Do whatever it takes to get them in the room. Keep antagonists out of the room and build a proactive environment. Attract GAC members who sign the front of paychecks, and do not seat elected officials and their representatives as voting members. Finally, your GAC must be the final voice for your advocacy efforts so you all can act smart and fast.

 

Empower your volunteers

 

Your GAC exists to be effective in representing the interests of business with government. To be effective, you can’t bog your process down in bureaucracy on every single issue because your effectiveness is in direct proportion to your efficiency. Therefore, any decision that the GAC makes must end at the GAC, not at your Board’s executive committee and then the full Board of Directors. The Board, including its leadership, such as your chairman, must empower its GAC to take positions on issues that align with a Board-approved platform of issues. If an issue does not align, then the Board can act. However, the platform of issues should be flexible enough to limit issues from making it to the Board for consideration. The GAC should be a work horse and not a recommending body. Update the Board accordingly on GAC positions but do not put the GAC in a position of being strangled from reaching the point of action because “that decision needs to go to the Board at its next meeting five weeks from now.â€

 

“Chamber executives need to look over the horizon and empower volunteers to take on the issues that impact our business community most. I am not afraid to push my government affairs volunteers to act and get engaged. That’s my job,†advises J. David Jameson, president and CEO of the Greater Aiken (SC) Chamber of Commerce. "In my position, it is expected that I use my bully pulpit."

 

Maintaining long-term committee participation is a common challenge chambers face, one that can be addressed by simply asking, “What policy issue have you solved for the business community recently?†You must be ensuring that your GAC meetings are action-oriented, not report-oriented. Every agenda item must propose taking a position. Simply bringing people together to hear reports from elected officials or reports on the latest and greatest is not enough. The bottom line: you keep people engaged when you give them something to rally behind. Be action-oriented so they understand that each month they are a part of making a decision on issues that impact your business community.

 

Prepare the GAC to select key issues

 

In any community, there are myriad issues that impact the local economy and quality of life. A chamber of commerce can find itself being pulled in multiple directions to take on every issue possible. Your GAC should select a limited number of issues that demand attention and understand that your Chamber can’t be all things to everyone.

 

“To get started in defining the issues you’ll take on,†says ACCE president Mick Fleming, “you might want the Board to sign off on a global policy statement such as: ‘It is the intention of this Chamber to take public positions on issues that affect the competitiveness of this community in relation to other communities or regions.’ Or, ‘It is the intention of this Chamber to work for policies that lower the cost of doing business for all employers in this region.’ Such statements can become the broad parameters—the Christmas trees—on which you AND the Board

hang your ornaments when determining specific positions.â€

 

It is very important for your GAC to foster discussion based on an agenda that adheres to the “ethic of reciprocity.†Confucius might say it another way: "Never impose a GAC agenda on others what you would not want for yourself." I recently received an emailed meeting agenda from a prominent regional government affairs organization. The agenda was sent the day before the meeting and included 22 attachments. Yes, 22 attachments. Do you have the time to read through 22 attachments of information? Who has that kind of time? I don’t. So I deleted the email and never attended the meeting.

 

“There is a danger associated with throwing too much information at our government affairs volunteers,†says Paul Jadin, president of the Green Bay (WI) Area Chamber of Commerce. “I make sure our government affairs staff prepares background materials in a concise and clear way so we can understand the issues and then take action quickly.â€

 

The bottom line: every advocacy decision starts with a well-prepared agenda. Combine all of your information into one document and summarize as much as you can. The key here is information management, not information overload.

 

Anticipating challenges

 

It is an important responsibility of those who lead government affairs-oriented chambers of commerce to know how to anticipate challenges. An advocacy effort is an empirical process that takes time to fine-tune. In other words, anticipating challenges gets easier over time through trial and error.

 

Practically speaking, chambers that successfully navigate through advocacy-related storms do so because they understand the reason why they decided to go down that path in the first place. The GAC might take a position on an unpopular issue that causes some members to cancel their memberships. The chambers that survive this type of membership backlash do so because they also understand the long-term rewards of their unpopular decision.

 

“We are not afraid to lose members because they disagree with our positions,†says Randy Gordon, president and CEO of the Long Beach (CA) Area Chamber of Commerce. “It’s our job as a Chamber to sometimes take the unpopular path and sometimes take that path alone. I always remind our team that we were put on this Earth to fight for business. We must stand by our decisions to the end, so win or lose, we can prove to our members that we are here for them no matter what challenges we face.â€

 

Success starts with structure

 

“Picking issues and drafting agendas are really the cornerstones of your advocacy work because for chambers, the mere articulation of your position on a given issue is a powerful lobbying statement,†says Fleming. “Lawmakers know that you have the strength of hundreds or hundreds of thousands of influential people behind every position you take. Just taking the position sends a loud message from the chamber to elected officials.â€

 

In the game of baseball, you will never see a batter hit a ball and then run directly up the middle of the infield to second base. If that were to happen, the umpire would immediately call the batter out. As a chamber chief executive, you must have the ability to keep your government affairs program running under a defined and outlined structure. You must hold everyone accountable to a structure so that decisions and key messages can be determined. Ultimately, you must take action and produce results for your members. Success starts with structure. And structure is the difference between winning most of the time and losing all of the time.

Rate this Article  rating of 0 from 0 votes
Public Policy | 0 Comments | Add a Comment | Permalink |

More on SC Governor's Tax Proposal

ACCE Webmaster on Thursday, December 11, 2008 at 9:54:21 pm 

Yesterday I shareda Dec 9th Tax Policy Blog recap of South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford's proposal to overhaul the state's tax structure.  The Tax Policy Blog said the proposed reform program would "vastly improve the state's business tax climate." 

Economic development groups in the state are not so sure.

According to The Greenville News, The South Carolina Economic Developers’ Association "balked" at the governor's proposal.  The organization stated that by eliminating  tax incentives the proposal would inhibit their ability to attract new employers to the state and "completely eliminate the very economic development tools that help make South Carolina competitive."

Sanford argues that current economic development incentives, "favor new and big businesses over longtime and small ones."  He added, "What if you just treated every business the same?"

Click HERE to read the full article.

The South Carolina Chamber issued this press release about Gov. Sanford's tax reform proposal.

Rate this Article  rating of 0 from 0 votes
Tax | 0 Comments | Add a Comment | Permalink |

Is Employer Paid Health Insurance the Problem?

ACCE Webmaster on Thursday, December 11, 2008 at 4:35:00 pm 

Health reform is a perennial discussion topic.  Everyone seems to agreethat the system is broken, but consensus mostly ends there.  Regarding health insurance alone there are multiple suggestions for how to fix the system.  Some groups want the government to be a single payer, a few states have tried mandating coverage, others advocate usingtax breaks to incent individual coverage.

In an editorial from yesterday's Wall Street Journal, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, chairman of the department of bioethics at the National Institutes of Health, and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) argue that the status quo, employer paid health insurance system is the problem.

They contend that the employer paid model developed as a way around WWII wage controls and is no longer ideal in an economy where companies compete globally and people change jobs frequently.  They also assert that the employer based system is fraught with waste and maintain that:

"The money that employers are spending to buy health care for their employees could otherwise go to workers in the form of higher wages, empowering individuals to make their own health-care choices."

Regardless of your views about health reform, this is a thought provoking article that is well worth a read.  Click HERE to access the full article.

Rate this Article  rating of 0 from 0 votes
Health Care | 0 Comments | Add a Comment | Permalink |

Chicago Tribune Declares "Card-checkocracy"

ACCE Webmaster on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 11:36:00 pm 

Last week the Chicago Tribune published an editorial criticizing Card Check.  The article succinctly sums up the essence of the proposed legislation and the rationale behind opposition:

"The Employee Free Choice Act would allow unions to create local bargaining units without winning the vote of a majority of workers in a secret ballot.

The local unit would be certified if a majority of workers endorsed it by signing an authorization card handed out by union organizers.

Fair enough? Not really. The so-called card-check bill would not protect workers and it would not be "free choice." It would strip away their right to vote in secret, making it more likely they would face intimidation from organizers and other workers. The pressure would be on to check the card, whether or not they actually wanted a union."

The authors go on to explain why unions want to pass this bill, and make 3 suggestions for labor reform that they claim will:

"...create more incentives for labor and management to negotiate in good faith and preserve the workers' right to a secret ballot."

Click HERE to read the full article.

 

Rate this Article  rating of 0 from 0 votes
Public Policy | 0 Comments | Add a Comment | Permalink |

South Carolina to Revamp Tax Structure

ACCE Webmaster on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 10:17:39 pm 

Yesterday, the Tax Foundation's Tax Policy Blog reported that South Carolina  Governor Mark Sanford has unveiled a tax reform proposal that they claim would, "vastly improve the state's business tax climate."

The proposal would introduce an optional flat personal income tax, index graduated tax brackets to inflation, phase out all corporate income tax over 10 years, increase the cigarette tax, introduce a landfill dumping fee and eliminate sales tax holidays.  The governor also called for an evaluation of the state's property tax structure.

Click HEREto read more details on the South Carolina tax reform proposal from the Tax Policy Blog.

Rate this Article  rating of 0 from 0 votes
Tax | 0 Comments | Add a Comment | Permalink |

The Merits of Merit Pay

ACCE Webmaster on Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 11:38:45 pm 

In merit pay In education circles, is a controversial topic.  The standard argument is that merit pay

The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that represents more than 175,000 educators (superintendents, supervisors, principals, teachers, and school boards) from 119 countries.

http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/oct08/vol66/num02/When_Merit_Pay_Is_Worth_Pursuing.aspx

http://www.heartland.org/policybot/results.html?articleid=20772

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/05/AR2008100502040.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/18/education/18pay.html

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3682

Rate this Article  rating of 0 from 0 votes
Education | 0 Comments | Add a Comment | Permalink |

As If Card Check Isn't Enough...

ACCE Webmaster on Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 6:12:00 pm 

"Backed by increased Democratic majorities in Congress and a labor-friendly president in the White House, unions hope to move several bills that would strengthen labor and increase union membership.."

According to nonpartisian Congressional newspaper The Hill, Card Check is not the only federal legislation that unions will push hard in 2009.  They are also trying to pass bills that would allow collective bargaining for public servants and extend the time workers could file wage discrimination lawsuits.

The article also reports that organized labor is likely to press for a hefty economic stimulus package and health care reform, and want a seat at the table during alternative energy and climate change discussions. 

Click HERE to read the full article.

Thanks to Dennis Lauver for catching this important article.

Rate this Article  rating of 0 from 0 votes
Public Policy | 0 Comments | Add a Comment | Permalink |

Maryland Chamber Launches Green Biz Blog

ACCE Webmaster on Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 1:06:48 am 

The Maryland Chamber of Commerce has launched a new Green Business Blog that is:

"...dedicated to discussing environmentally friendly business practices, environmental legislation affecting Maryland businesses, and tips on how to “go green.” "

Recent posts include a Green Best Practice Guide from the Chamber's Environmental Task Force and information on how global warming legislation is threatening the state's brick industry.

Click HERE to check out the Maryland Chamber's Green Business Blog.

 

Rate this Article  rating of 0 from 0 votes
Environment and Energy | 0 Comments | Add a Comment | Permalink |

Build Our Way Out?

ACCE Webmaster on Saturday, December 6, 2008 at 1:03:44 am 

Is extensive infrastructure investment the answer (or at least part of the answer) to America's economy? 

Thousands of highway, bridge, transit, and public building projects are ready to go pending funding.  A massive federal infrastructure investment could create the short term construction jobs and economic ripple effect that would jump start the economy and better equip our regions to succeed in the long run.  But there are some issues.  For example, would projects win funding based on urgency of need or broader national priorities?  Will a national organization allocate funding directly to local MPOs, or would state DOTs be left to decide?

Columnist Neal Pierce addresses all these questions and more in his latest Citiwire.net installment: Finally a Green Light For Smart Infrastructure?

Take a read, this is an issue we all need to think about.  Quickly!

Rate this Article  rating of 0 from 0 votes
Transportation | 0 Comments | Add a Comment | Permalink |
OFFICIAL CORPORATE SPONSORS
Accrisoft is an Official Corporate Sponsor of ACCE American Express is an Official Corporate Sponsor of ACCE Aventura World by Central Holidays West is an Official Corporate Sponsor of ACCE, the Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives Benfits Trust is an Official Corporate Sponsor of ACCE Citslinc is an Official Corporate Sponsor of ACCE Grow With Google is an Official Corporate Sponsor of ACCE New Insperity Market Street Services is an Official Corporate Sponsor of ACCE, the Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives The U.S. Chamber is an Official Corporate Sponsor of ACCE Vistage is an Official Corporate Sponsor of ACCE
SILVER SPONSORS
Avalanche Consulting sponsors ACCE, the Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives CardConnect sponsors ACCE, the Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives Constant Contact POWER 10 sponsors ACCE, the Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives United Networks of America is an Official Corporate Sponsor of ACCE YouScience sponsor ACCE, the Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives
Sponsorship and advertising opportunities Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives